Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I agree that the GPLv3 is not "compatible" with the OpenSSL license, in the
> sense that code licensed under the OpenSSL license cannot be included in a
> GPLv3 work. However, the GPLv3 does include a broader (if no more easily
> understood) system exception clause, which seems to allow distributing GPLv3
> binaries that are /dynamically linked/ against OpenSSL. Is this not the
> position of FSF/FSF Europe?
I am discussing this in detail with Brett Smith of FSF.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> OK, I think the possible solutions are pretty clear to me. Thank you
for the
> rapid response.
No problem.
Kern, if it would be useful to you I can arrange a physical meeting or
telephone call to discuss these things in more detail. After all, we
are only a few kilometres from each other in Switzerland and we might be
able to explore options more quickly that way.
Regards
Shane
- --
Shane Coughlan
FTF Coordinator
Free Software Foundation Europe
Office: +41435000366 ext 408 / Mobile: +41792633406
coughlan@fsfeurope.org
Support Free Software > http://fsfe.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBRpkLutGa7CzA5hXyAQKT5AQAnm8Rf+mzyNtRf29/zhrT/PNQ5agRlJyn
zN7LGecsMiFlCfEPI/0OAeu4Y4rE56QnFiJJQjEp4gUw7ybKeNFzCguLegBIUyoi
HME3kurobaAgBKA1Bt6dZClE4N1bQ3u9sVmhH9QjWL+HU4ldoLtI6OduqBDNUyin
H3OOojb1/Jw=
=qI0F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: