Re: Debian-approved creative/content license?
Joe Smith <unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 1. The model files, lighting, and animation information. This can be used to
> regenerate the movie.
> 2. The original raw frames of the rendered video.
> 3. The compressed final video stream.
[...]
> So which one(s) should be considered source?
Obviously 1, but it may be helpful to distribute 2 or 3 for some purposes.
Hope that helps,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: