On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:35:57 -0500 Evan Prodromou wrote: [...] > That includes the amended revocation and > attribution clauses that Francesco is concerned with; we thought they > were sufficiently softened that they were not an effective prevention > of licensors exercising their freedom. A softened non-free restriction is just that: a softened issue, not a vanished one. I repeatedly expressed my concerns, but I haven't yet seen any convincing rebuttal. In addition to that, there's the well-known anti-TPM clause, the actual meaning of which is not clear to me at all (even Creative Commons official representatives refuse to disclose their interpretation of the clause![1]). [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/09/msg00155.html -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpaVVgGPWm6Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature