Re: [OT] Re: Please fix broken MUAs, was: GFDL v2 draft 1 analysis [long]

[MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>]

Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 03:53:25PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > That's probably because Mail-Followup-To is not the solution.
> 
>   you're a bit tiredsome with that. List-Post does not helps you to
> specify that you want to be set as a Cc: or not when someones answers to
> a mail.

Nor does M-F-T.  There is no substitute for human intelligence and correct
configuration.

> [...] there is no harm in adding a harmless header that can help a lot of
> MUAs.

Look again at all the time and space consumed by pointless M-F-T advocacy
and you-ignored-my-M-F-T flames, if you think there's no harm in it.

> or please strip your signature, it costs many more octets than a M-F-T.

Unlike an M-F-T, it gives sometimes-useful information.

Regards,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct