Re: The legality of wodim
Oliver Vivell <oliver@vivell.info> wrote:
> Please stop spreading your superficial knowledge about legal things.
> You've proven, that you are far away to have the legal expertise to
> judge whether all other opinions beside yours are wrong.
It is bad to see that nobody who recently answered to this thread seems to
have the needed legal knowledge and nobody even tries to ask a lawyer for help.
Please do not continue to spread laymens guesses.
> To think that only your opinion is the only correct one in the world is
> ridiculous. You might have your opinion (even if it's absolutely
> minority), but others too.
In the eyes of uninformed people, the reality may look ridiculous.
Try to get help from a lawyer.....
> I'm fed up reading that everybody except you is competent enough to
> understand the GPL. That's not the right way to convince somebody.
If you are so certain that your ideas are corect, why don't you prove your
claims by quotes from the original GPL text?
> And if you use terms, please translate them into english, that everybody
> understands them, so don't use "Urheberrecht" but the english term
> "Intellectual property rights".
You are really funny.
The "official" translation for "Urheberrecht" is "Copyright", but this is
not a correct translation. The best way to deal with this problem is to use
the non-abiguous original word "Urheberrecht".
If you like to read the legal base for my software, you need to read the German
original (e.g. here: http://bundesrecht.juris.de/urhg/index.html) anyway.
"Intellectual property rights" is even a wrong translation as this term from
my understanding only applies to the parts of the "Urheberrecht" that are
missing in the US Copyright law.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
Reply to: