Re: The legality of wodim
Brett Parker <iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 16:39 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> > > > So make sure that "wodim" prints something like:
> > > >
> > > > "This program is known to have bugs that are not present in the original software"
> > > >
> > > > and it mets the rules.
> > >
> > > Sorry, but we are not allowed to display false statements like this one..
> >
> > Finally stop spreding your FUD, the correctness of this statement is verified by
> > the debian bug tracking system.
>
> Just because no one bothers filing the bugs against the "origional"
> anymore doesn't mean that they don't exist... or have you been through
> the bugs and verified that none of them exist in your cdrtools? If not,
You are corrert! None of the bugs applies to the original cdrecord ;-)
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
Reply to: