[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anti-TPM clauses



On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:13:31PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:31:04 +0200 Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> > Are they *DFSG-free* or not? So yes, it *is* a GR-vote who
> > decides here. Because the DFSG are only changed or clarified by such a
> > vote.
> Please note that GR-2006-001 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001)
> did not change the DFSG: that would have needed a 3:1 supermajority,
> which the winning option did not require.

Of course, whether an option requires a 3:1 supermajority is decided by
the secretary based on his (or hypothetically her) best understanding
and interpretation of the constitution, the proposed resolution and
their implications. These are judgement calls, not facts that can be
derived purely from an empirical study of the universe.

Cheers,
aj

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: