Re: Anti-TPM clauses
Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> writes:
> email@example.com wrote:
> >There seem to be consensus that as long as there is no vote on [CC
> >by-sa 3.0], it's probably non-free, and best not put it in
> >main. Correct?
> Wrong. CC-BY-SA 3.0 is a free license and many works licensed this
> way are in main.
Note that the latter does not necessarily imply the former. Many
packages have been in main against the advice of a consensus view on
debian-legal that the package is non-free.
\ "To be is to do" —Plato |
`\ "To do is to be" —Aristotle |
_o__) "Do be do be do" —Sinatra |