[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anti-TPM clauses

Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> writes:

> debian2007@macfreek.nl wrote:
> >There seem to be consensus that as long as there is no vote on [CC
> >by-sa 3.0], it's probably non-free, and best not put it in
> >main. Correct?

> Wrong. CC-BY-SA 3.0 is a free license and many works licensed this
> way are in main.

Note that the latter does not necessarily imply the former. Many
packages have been in main against the advice of a consensus view on
debian-legal that the package is non-free.

 \                                             "To be is to do" —Plato |
  `\                                       "To do is to be" —Aristotle |
_o__)                                        "Do be do be do" —Sinatra |
Ben Finney

Reply to: