Re: GFDL and cover texts
On 06/08/07, Evan Prodromou <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-08 at 08:58 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > Can I get an explanation of why Debian considers a GFDL manual with
> > cover texts non-free?
The position statement and the vote all conflate invariant sections
with cover texts and dedications as if exactly the same arguments
against invariant sections applied to a cover text like "a gnu
manual". Why are three words enough to make thousands upon thousands
of words nonfree?
- Jordi G. H.