dcraw license change: (see bug #424663)
The licensing of dcraw has recently changed:
A clause concerning the mandatory distribution of source code has been
modified with the following footnote added:
>If you have not modified dcraw.c in any way, a link to my
>homepage qualifies as "full source code".
To me, this seems *less* restrictive than the clause without this footnote.
It seems that you only need to include a link to the source code (which is
already present in the copyright file), and don't need to make the source
However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal experts
could confirm that they agree that this is the case.
link to source code (containing full license)