On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:43:22 -0700 Sean Kellogg wrote: > On Sunday 01 July 2007 01:53:52 pm Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > My case was: > > > > Q: Could this requirement be interpreted more liberally? > > A: I wish it could, but I am afraid it cannot... :-( > > > > Frankly speaking, it seems more similar to your first example, than > > to your second one... > > I spent some time thinking about this while out hiking today, and I > think you're probably right. While Mr. Finney's post about the > meaning of "I am afraid that..." is spot on, I also tend to think the > above would not fall into the realm of "legal advice." Not so much > because of the answer, but because of the nature of the question. > The sort of vague, "what about..." sort of question lacks the > particulars necessary to really illicit a legal advice sort of > response. My apologies for not looking at every factor first. That's OK, apologies accepted... -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpwlo6Gvr20q.pgp
Description: PGP signature