[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Final text of GPL v3



On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:43:22 -0700 Sean Kellogg wrote:

> On Sunday 01 July 2007 01:53:52 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > My case was:
> >
> > Q: Could this requirement be interpreted more liberally?
> > A: I wish it could, but I am afraid it cannot...  :-(
> >
> > Frankly speaking, it seems more similar to your first example, than
> > to your second one...
> 
> I spent some time thinking about this while out hiking today, and I
> think  you're probably right.  While Mr. Finney's post about the
> meaning of "I am  afraid that..." is spot on, I also tend to think the
> above would not fall  into the realm of "legal advice."  Not so much
> because of the answer, but  because of the nature of the question. 
> The sort of vague, "what about..."  sort of question lacks the
> particulars necessary to really illicit a legal  advice sort of
> response. My apologies for not looking at every factor first.

That's OK, apologies accepted...

-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
 Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpBkNS4mbVFe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: