Re: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:17:00AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> + file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in
> + that directory since different, incompatible versions of these
> + licenses have been published by the Free Software Foundation,
> + hence using the symlinks could lead to ambiguity.
> I disagree with this. It should be ok to point to the latest version
> of the GPL if the program says "Version X or later". Many programs
> do that, and we should not need to change them.
> Instead, I think we should amend policy in this way:
> Packages under a fixed, definite version of the GPL should refer to
> the versioned GPL file in /usr/share/common-licenses.
Good idea. Should we also specify that referring to the unversioned GPL
is for programs that say "Version X or later" ? I think this is not obvious.
My spam trap is firstname.lastname@example.org. Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.