[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta



On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:13:25 -0400 Joe Smith wrote:

> 
> "Francesco Poli" <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote in message 
> 20070527011846.204858e0.frx@firenze.linux.it">news:20070527011846.204858e0.frx@firenze.linux.it...
> >Sam Hocevar <sam@zoy.org> wrote:
> >>     1. The GPLv3: the latest draft did not raise major objections
> >from >  -legal
> >
> >I don't think that this is an accurate description of the discussion.
> >See  http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/euei2j$qqc$1@sea.gmane.org
> >
> I'm not sure if I would charcterize my analysis as including major 
> objections, but rather some concerns.
> I explicitly stated that I did n ot actually find DFSG problems,
> although  two complicated portions were not analyized.
> So I would say I had concerns but not nessisrally objections.

I am sorry for not being clear enough: I meant to refer to the *thread*
that started from your message, not just to your message.
I now realize that, unfortunately, the rest thread was on the next month
and hence is not linked by the web archives!
I apologize, the rest of the thread starts here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/04/msg00001.html


-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
 Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpQ2MCbk2q3b.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: