Re: (C) vs ©

To: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
Cc: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <antti-juhani@kaijanaho.fi>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: (C) vs ©
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <antti-juhani@kaijanaho.fi>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 18:19:40 +0300
Message-id: <20070528151938.GA12048@kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi>
In-reply-to: <46592E6C.2000605@gmail.com>
References: <46513FCF.5030703@gmail.com> <20070522125437.GF5208@kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi> <46592E6C.2000605@gmail.com>

On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:38:28PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> So I can simply avoid using either (C) or © and thus avoid this whole 
> problem?

Sorry, I misread your question originally.  You can drop the word Copyright,
but you cannot drop the copyright symbol, if you care about UCC compliance.

Reply to:

References:
- (C) vs ©
  - From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
- Re: (C) vs ©
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <antti-juhani@kaijanaho.fi>
- Re: (C) vs ©
  - From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
Next by Date: Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
Next by thread: Re: (C) vs ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread