You mean the fact that I "misunderstand" the recipients' right to copy and re-use the text of eg the GPL?Anthony W. Youngman wrote:Licence documents MUST be invariant. They are legal documents, with legal force, and you're trying to give the recipient the right to mess about with them!No, you're wrong. This is a FAQ. There's a difference between changing the license for a work (impossible) and creating derivative licenses (possible and even desirable). The rest of your message is irrelevant because of your basic misunderstanding.
If I'm misunderstanding the OP, then I think the OP is misunderstanding the problem! The OP is, I believe, arguing "you cannot modify the GPL". AIUI, you *can* modify the GPL. You just then can't *call* it the GPL, which is a trademark issue not a copyright issue.
Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman - anthony@thewolery.demon.co.uk