Re: [RFC]: firmware-ipw2200, acceptable for non-free?

[Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>]

frx@firenze.linux.it wrote:

>This sounds like another cheap excuse: I cannot believe that the law
>really says that *Intel* is responsible if *I* modify an Intel WiFi card
>so that it exceeds regulatory limits...
Too bad. But their laywers do, and this is what matters.

>Intel should be able to sell easily-reprogrammable WiFi cards: if *I*
>modify one card and exceed regulatory limits, I should be seen as the
>*sole* responsible.
And a pony!

-- 
ciao,
Marco