Re: [RFC]: firmware-ipw2200, acceptable for non-free?
>This sounds like another cheap excuse: I cannot believe that the law
>really says that *Intel* is responsible if *I* modify an Intel WiFi card
>so that it exceeds regulatory limits...
Too bad. But their laywers do, and this is what matters.
>Intel should be able to sell easily-reprogrammable WiFi cards: if *I*
>modify one card and exceed regulatory limits, I should be seen as the
And a pony!