Re: Bug#385990: (forw) Bug#385990: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#385990: ttf-malayalam-fonts: Add another font to the package
- To: Soumyadip Modak <soumyadip.modak@gmail.com>
- Cc: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>, 385990@bugs.debian.org, vivekcherian@gmail.com, Mahesh Pai <paivakil@gmail.com>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, cibu@users.sourceforge.net, 403404-submitter@bugs.debian.org, peringz@users.sourceforge.net, kevinsiji@users.sourceforge.net
- Subject: Re: Bug#385990: (forw) Bug#385990: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#385990: ttf-malayalam-fonts: Add another font to the package
- From: "Mahesh T. Pai" <paivakil@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:31:40 +0530
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20061218140140.GA14523@nandini.home>
- Mail-followup-to: Soumyadip Modak <soumyadip.modak@gmail.com>, Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>, 385990@bugs.debian.org, vivekcherian@gmail.com, Mahesh Pai <paivakil@gmail.com>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, cibu@users.sourceforge.net, 403404-submitter@bugs.debian.org, peringz@users.sourceforge.net, kevinsiji@users.sourceforge.net
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 93667cbe0612172038r6a57d98ep348f3fe65b189e98@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] 20061217184854.GE6003@kheops.homeunix.org> <[🔎] 93667cbe0612172038r6a57d98ep348f3fe65b189e98@mail.gmail.com>
Soumyadip Modak said on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:08:41AM +0530,:
> As far as I remember, I received a mail from the original
> developers of RacOtf who claim it is GPL-ed. I'll hunt up the mail
> and forward it. I plan to include it in the next big upgrade of
> ttf-indic-fonts (I'm sorry I can't do it right now, since my home
> DSL is down). If Christian does decide to do an NMU to include
> Anjali Old Lipi, that'll be great :)
You mean they confirmed that the font is GPL'ed? and modification is
actually allowed?
And IIRC, Rachana fonts form chillus without the zwj character, which
does not conform to the Unicode standards. Praveen, has this problem
been fixed?
--
It's not the software that's free; it's you.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: