Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal

To: Sean Kellogg <skellogg@u.washington.edu>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:21:14 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061207092114.GL2733@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Sean Kellogg <skellogg@u.washington.edu>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200612061526.40688.skellogg@u.washington.edu>
References: <[🔎] 4575EB5C.1080503@gmail.com> <[🔎] 200612061303.47473.skellogg@u.washington.edu> <[🔎] 20061206230558.GF13589@archimedes.ucr.edu> <[🔎] 200612061526.40688.skellogg@u.washington.edu>

* Sean Kellogg (skellogg@u.washington.edu) [061207 00:26]:
> Debian just doesn't want to be bothered with the hassel of 
> having to build the brand of Iceweasel, so it appears to have decided to 
> co-opt the Firefox name.

That is a lie.


Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
  - From: Jeff Carr <basilarchia@gmail.com>
- Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
  - From: Sean Kellogg <skellogg@u.washington.edu>
- Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
  - From: Sean Kellogg <skellogg@u.washington.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
Next by Date: Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
Previous by thread: Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
Next by thread: Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread