On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:15:47 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote: > My guess is that Mia's response is a political one. Their > international affiliates have opposed additional parallel distribution > language; we've said that the language in the 3.0 draft may be enough > to allow parallel distribution anyways. Rather than getting them > upset, she's given us a barely-qualified yes. I think we should take > our victory as gracefully and discreetly as we can. Is that a victory? We do not even really know if parallel distribution is meant to be allowed in cases where the licensor is the license drafter... -- But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpDtk6xSPKXa.pgp
Description: PGP signature