On 8/30/06, Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com> wrote:
Steve Langasek has said, in essence "When A says X, and we have no evidence to the contrary, we believe A". Your objection, in essence seems to be "We should not believe X when we have no evidence that X is true."
Well... more exactly, I try to say "A does not say X, he says Y". And we appear to differ on how much serious is Y.