[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [d-i manual] gpl section



( Full quote of original posting (to debian-boot)
because debian-legal is also addressed )

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:08:48PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> 1.
> I just comitted an unofficial translation of the gpl for 
> german to the manual and I noticed, that the paragraphs (§0 - 12)
> of the license are not numbered. They are formatted with 
> <itemizedlist><listitem><para> and so there are no numbers
> (only dots for the listing).
> I think it would be better to have some numbering, since in the 
> license there are sometimes links/comments to other paragraphs
> ("which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1
> and 2 above ...")
> 
> 
> Possible solution:
> 
> =======snip=====
> 
> </para>
> 
> <itemizedlist><listitem><para>
> 
> - This License applies to any program or other work which contains a
> + §0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a 
> notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed 
> 
> =======snap====
> 
> I have changed that in german as an proposal:
> see http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/de.alpha/apfs02.html
> 
> 
> 
> 2.
> In chapter "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs" it would be
> better to have the parts, that should be integrated into source files,
> formatted separately (ie as <informalexample>).
> Especially when you have the text mentioned in two languages (as I have
> in german now).
> 
> See http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/de.alpha/apfs03.html
> 
> 
> 
> Comments?

IANAL, but my feeling is
 "do not modify a legal document
  not even inserting numbers"


> I think it would be better to have some numbering, since in the 
> license there are sometimes links/comments to other paragraphs
> ("which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1
> and 2 above ...")

If you miss "hyperlinks" in a legal document,
then get them included in new documents. (not in existing ones )


HtH
GSt



Reply to: