Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2

To: <dannf@debian.org>, <256332@bugs.debian.org>, <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2
From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:04:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E1FWDIE-000816-00@pipe.localnet.towers.org.uk>
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:27:39 -0600 <[🔎] 20060418042739.GF20248@colo>
References: <20060405225512.GD31968@colo> <000001c65976$d46a7f40$66dc0a0a@northstar> <20060406160643.GC10900@colo> <44355A4A.4000205@oracle.com> <[🔎] 20060406215140.GB22737@colo> <[🔎] E1FRnPQ-0004HJ-00@pipe.localnet.towers.org.uk> <[🔎] 20060418042739.GF20248@colo>

dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>
> I would classify this as a legal/licensing issue, not a documentation
> issue.

Aren't most documentation licensing bugs sarge-ignore?

-- 
MJR/slef

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2
  - From: dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>

References:
- Re: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2
  - From: dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
- Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
- Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2
  - From: dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing
Next by Date: Workshop: IPR implications for Free/Libre and Open Source Software
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2
Next by thread: Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread