[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Void license problem



Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 00:54:33 +0100
Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org> wrote:

> Well, that's an extraordinarily noisy website.  A link to the actual
> licenses might motivate me more, but generally speaking, if they just
> say public domain without any additional disclaimers or riders, that
> should be fine.

Thank you for the answer.

I was investigating all the source code of the software i'm packageing
and isn't necessary set libtom{crypto|math} as build-deps or runtime
deps because the upstream author only included a few lines (some crypto
functions he needed) from this libs on his source code and licensed all
with GPL, isn't necessary create packages for each library.

I'm asking the Upstrean Author for permissions from Tom St Denis
(original author of libtom) to license parts of his library included in
his software with GPL license. 

Best regards,

-- 
Nacho Barrientos Arias <chipi@criptonita.com>
GPG: 0xE103FC4D - http://criptonita.com/~nacho
(Signed/Encrypted Email Preferred)
	

Attachment: pgpi4jNgn85OI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: