Re: Against DRM 1.0
Max Brown wrote:
The license is copyleft... :-) It's a clear license, imho.
If you assume that "the renunciation to esclusive[sic] exsercise[sic] of
rights referred to in the articles 4 and 5" implies a compulsion to
grant rights. I don't think it does, and if it's supposed to, there are
much clearer ways of saying this.
For example, 'You must cause any work that you distribute or publish,
that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
parties under the terms of this License.'.
Reply to: