[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions



On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:44:54 +0800 Weakish Jiang wrote:

> 
> 
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Please note the adjective "effective"!
> > 
> > Questions:
> > 
> >  A) Why are these two clauses different from one another?
> > 
> >  B) Is the difference relevant with respect to DFSG compliance?
> > 
> >  C) Does specifying that only *effective* technological measures are
> > forbidden imply that parallel distribution (of DRM-encumbered and
> > DRM-*un*encumbered copies) is allowed for Adaptations?
> > 
> 
> It's strange that these two clauses are different, but I think they
> are equivalent.

Well, there's a significant word in one which is absent from the other.
I don't think they can be construed as equivalent.

> 
> It seems that CreativeCommoons wants to fight against DRM using the CC
> license.

Indeed, we are talking about this clause and trying to determine whether
CC is doing that in a DFSG-free manner or not...



P.S.: Please do not reply to my e-mail address Cc:ing the list, since I
didn't asked for that.  Instead, reply to the list only.  Thanks.


-- 
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend.   -- from _Coming to America_
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgp2Xk7aVKVfr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: