[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ccsumary]Creative Commons 2.5 Licenses

\"weakish jiang\" <weakish@gmail.com> wrote: [...]
> IMO, sadly,  at least the CC organization means \"all other\". In the
> Chinese translation of CC Attribute 2.5 . They use the a Chinese word
> meaning \"at the same time\", and the word \"comparable\" was omitted in
> the Chinese translation.

You may want to question that, as I don't think it would be the first
time a translation team had not chosen quite the best word.

In general, I agree with your analysis.  2.5 is improved a little.

> BTW, it seems hard to find an ideal lisence for works besides progrem.

I think it's easy: most free software licences are good for non-programs.

I acknowledge that some people want a licence which covers non-programs
in more detail.  I had high hopes about cc 3.0 removing the ban on cc works
being copied onto certain media or devices that require Technological
Protection Measures (TPM, a part of DRM).  If you see a cc 3.0 draft,
ask them to remove the TPM-copy-ban and require a parallel non-TPM copy

My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct

Reply to: