Re: shc -- #335278 broken packaging -- non-DD NMU prepared
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: shc -- #335278 broken packaging -- non-DD NMU prepared
- From: "Joe Smith" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:41:55 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com> <20060627183258.GB3927@schmehl.info> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20060627225859.GH3927@schmehl.info> <20060628221048.GA17788@yellowpig.yi.org>
<email@example.com> wrote in message
That message subject strongly implies that Mr. Allen has no problem with
people distributing (potentially modified) versions of the code in that
message. On the other hand, There is a good possibility that he does not own
the rights to the code.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:58:59AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* 'Alleged RC4' Source Code picked up from the news."
* From: firstname.lastname@example.org (John L. Allen)"
* Newsgroups: comp.lang.c"
* Subject: Shrink this C code for fame and fun"
* Date: 21 May 1996 10:49:37 -0400"
Anyway, it is very very easy to re-implement arcfour. That is the very
reason why that was chosen as the cipher for ciphersaber.
In fact, There is an rc4 implementation in the oublic domain, as part of a
ciphersaber implmentation available at: