On Wednesday 21 June 2006 10:49, Pekka Pessi wrote: > "ext George Danchev" <danchev@spnet.net> writes: > >> Perhaps the usage is small enough that the code is not really a > >> derivative work of RFC3174. If you're lucky. If not, there's probably > >> an alternate SHA1 implementation somewhere which doesn't use the RFC > >> sample code, which could be substituted; the actual cipher almost > >> certainly qualifies as an uncopyrightable "fact". > >> ---- > > > >Aha, these are the files: > >libsofia-sip-ua/ipt/sofia-sip/sha1.h > >libsofia-sip-ua/ipt/sha1.c > > Hmhh. We do not use them much within library, we could distribute > them separately for applications. I'll have to have peek around > for the code... removed or better yet, reimplemented ;-) > >> All the other licenses are fine. > > > >Good. > > > >> Joe Smith noted two without an explicit right to sell, but the IBM one > >> grants the right to "use in any way he or she deems fit", which I think > >> is pretty definite permission. > >> > >> The other says "unrestricted use", which *probably* implies the right > >> to sell; I would contact Pekka Pessi and ask if that includes the right > >> to sell. If he says "yes", then I'd say it's fine. > > "Yes." Thanks. > >This applies to libsofia-sip-ua/ipt/rc4.c, and > >libsofia-sip-ua/su/getopt.c was incorrectly mentioned in the > >COPYRIGHTS, since it does not exist. > > It looks to me that getopt.c is still there? It is in thecurrent darcs repository as found at: http://sofia-sip.org/repos/sofia-sip/libsofia-sip-ua/su/getopt.c but not distributed with the tarball as found at: http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sofia-sip/sofia-sip-1.12.0.tar.gz with md5sum of 'e0919823ca1bf32bb062ce161cc5accb' or probably that is not the intended behaviour ? -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
Attachment:
pgpShKqPmOXVd.pgp
Description: PGP signature