Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal
Matthew Garrett <email@example.com>
> Starting with "What is key for Debian" makes it sound like a policy
> statement on behalf of Debian, and "Just fix the license" could then be
> interpreted as a demand from Debian that Sun alter the license.
If Sun believe things from random people that easily, then I've an
Eiffel Tower to sell them at a discount price...
> In that
> context, it seems reasonable to point out that Walter is not in a
> position to speak on behalf of Debian.
I think Walter Landry already did that with a ucsd.edu sig block.
At least the reply was better than the "For those playing along at
home" trolls posted recently.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct