[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#323099: Bug #323099 should not have been closed

Am Mittwoch, den 17.05.2006, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli:

> I don't agree that GR-2006-001 outcome makes this a non-bug.
> AFAICS from the bug log, it seems that wget documentation
> includes invariant sections: hence GR-2006-001 restates
> its non-freeness.

Don explain the problem of this part of wget-1.10.2/doc/wget.texi to me,
so its not a problem of the GFDL license itself on the documentation but
the problem of this text in the file:

"Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
Invariant Sections being ``GNU General Public License'' and ``GNU Free
Documentation License'', with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in the section
entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''."
(its twice in the file)

Without these parts the problem/bug would be solved.
Don wants to write some lines about the problem to the list. Thanks Don.

Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: