Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France
Mike Hommey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 03:22:56PM +0000, MJ Ray <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Simon Vallet <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > 1=B0 To willingly edit, distribute to the public, or inform the public
> > > about, in any form, a device whose obvious purpose is to permit
> > > unauthorized distribution of protected works
> > Can someone tell me what 'obvious purpose' means here? [...]
> The text is probably fuzzy on purpose. Until it is ruled by a court, it
> will remain fuzzy.
I thought French law was a code and did not rely so much on case
rulings by courts. Have I misunderstood?
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct