On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:11:45 -0700 Joe Buck wrote: > That is, the necessity to make a written offer good for three years > is sometimes painful, There's no such necessity in the GNU GPL v2. GPLv2, section 3 offers three alternative paths, only one of which requires that you make a written offer, valid for at least three years (see clause 3b). If you accompany the compiled form with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code (see clause 3a), you have no other future obligations. Clause 3b is the non-free option. Clause 3a is the free one. > as is the necessity to keep a transparent copy > available for one year. The GFDL (v1.2) puts different requirements. If you distribute more than 100 Opaque copies of the document, you have two options: * you /include/ (not accompany!) a machine-readable Transparent copy along with each Opaque copy * you provide a URL that must stay alive for at least one year after the ditribution of the last Opaque copy The second option is non-free. The first one forces users to download the Transparent copy, even if they don't want it. My opinion is that this is non-free too. I do not yet fully understand what conclusions can be drawn from GR-2006-001 results, but it seems that the Debian Project majority disagrees with me... :-( -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpSCnoGiYkUD.pgp
Description: PGP signature