frx@firenze.linux.it wrote: >I don't agree that this clause is DFSG-free. >It says that the name of an augmented font cannot *include* the term >STIX or *any similar* term. >That is significantly broader than what is allowed by DFGS#4, which >states (in part): Your understanding of the DFSG is well beyond what so far has been its commonly accepted meaning. -- ciao, Marco