On Tuesday 20 December 2005 07:37, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> > > > bahner@debian.org wrote: > >>I think the subject of my former email quite clearly states QPL? > > > > Then you do not need to worry, because the QPL is a free license. > > Readers should beware that Marco holds this opinion in known > opposition to most other people on this list. Saying "most other people" is certainly an overstatement. I believe the license is free and complies with the DFSG, but it can be problematic when linked with software that has incompatible licenses. Readers should also note that the FSF believes[1] that the QPL is a free license; but it's not GPL compatible. [1] http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses -- Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> <xmpp:wjl@icecavern.net> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
Attachment:
pgp8BMn99xBe_.pgp
Description: PGP signature