Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
Marco d'Itri writes:
> mdpoole@troilus.org wrote:
>
>>>>Is a license that requires micropayments in exchange for distribution rights
>>>>free? If not, why is a cost measured in terms of legal risk imposed by the
>>>>license more free than one measured in hundredths of a cent?
>>> Because it's not obviously a "cost".
>>I have already explained why it *is* a cost. Choice of venue is a
> And many people explained why the do not believe it is, at least in the
> meaning used by the DFSG.
How do you distinguish a requirement that the user abide by some
remote court's process from a requirement that the user pet a cat,
volunteer for some personally distasteful organization, etc? Are
those DFSG-free requirements?
Michael Poole
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Humberto Massa Guimarães <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@winstonsmith.info>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>