Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
Scripsit Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
> Well, I'm explaining that it isn't free because of DFSG#5. However, it
> seems that you are refusing such arguments de facto.
I doubt that "people who do not wish to become legally bound to appear
at the the author's home court whenever he files a frivolous lawsuit"
can be meaningfully described as a "group of persons" that can be
discriminated against. If everybody belongs to the group, is it
meaningfull to discriminate against it?
--
Henning Makholm "Larry wants to replicate all the time ... ah, no,
all I meant was that he likes to have a bang everywhere."
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>