Re: non dfsg compliant build scripts

[Michael Ablassmeier <abi@grinser.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi Bas,

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> You wrote:
> > Shipping iffe in the source tarball would not prevent any user from
> > deriving/modifying/patching `di' itself.  As long as iffe doesn't get
> > installed as a package, nor is represented as being part of `di', I
> > don't see a problem, though. Please speak up :)
> 
> If indeed `di' build-depends on `iffe' and `iffe' is non-free, then `di'
> cannot go into main, regardsless of the fact that the resulting binary
> does not depend on `iffe'.

oh well, yes, you are of course right. This point didnt (for whatever
reason) come up to my mind until now :) 

bye,
    - michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC63L6EFV7g4B8rCURAqUyAJ9FhCWxvAE0gLd4Vaql+0cECrA6vgCgqrSX
5UaamEACEgziYA6N9jCXULM=
=G8HV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----