Re: Is this license DFSG free?
Sean Kellogg <skellogg@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> Well, that's certainly a great deal better, structurally. I guess I've nev=
> er=20
> really seen any ftp-master discussion on this list... but then again, I=20
> don't know their names, so I wouldn't really know who was who. But at leas=
> t=20
> there is some amount of accountability.
There is a communication problem with some delegates at the moment,
but debian-legal is not the only place that has been raised. I think
that would be a good topic for the DPL team to examine urgently. It
would help to direct debian-legal if ftpmasters didn't only appear
to troll. I last lamented this in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/05/msg00570.html
> The fact remains that it is far too easy to criticize d-l if operations=20
> continue under this system. I've been on this list for almost 4 years, wit=
> h=20
> special attention ever since I entered law school... I know the sort of=20
> round-and-round fights that go on here that later get presented in FAQ's as=
> consensus. =20
Could you please name some and what FAQs present them as consensus?
> As I said, I've never actually heard an ftp-master agree or disagree with t=
> he=20
> list... but if I were in their position I would have a hard time accepting=
> advice from a forum who can't point to language that backs their claim.
Some of us can and do. Maybe you simply disagree with it?
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: