On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:22:59PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:17:42PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:20:05PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > You've got a problem with this one, because licenses can be combined > > > conjunctively and disjunctively. So a package might be both entirely > > > under foo and entirely under bar (foo || bar), or it might be > > > partially under foo and partially under bar (foo && bar). > > > > If that is the only problem, a package can be tagged with more than one > > tag even from the same facet, which would be good enough to categorise > > your two examples. > > Imagine a package that can be distributed if you meet the terms of: > Uhh, unclear, this should be read as: EITHER > - the GPL OR > - both the MIT license and the 4-clause BSD license, simultaneously OR > - both the MIT license and the Artistic license, simultaneously -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature