On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:56:21PM +0100, Lewis Jardine wrote: > Do they not require that you distribute with no further restrictions > than what they restrict (the GFDL uses 'and that you add no other > conditions whatsoever to those of this License', and the GPL uses 'You > may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of > the rights granted herein'). The difference between requiring no further > restrictions, and requiring identical terms being that they are fine > with you granting additional permissions*. > > If I'm right about this, a document licensed as 'The GFDL and/or GPL v2, > at your option' by the copyright holder could be distributed by a third > party under the GFDL, the GPL, or 'The GFDL and/or GPL v2, at your > option'. Sure. Wikipedia is not such a document, being licensed under the GFDL only. So that's not particularly relevant. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature