On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:20:00 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote: > MJ Ray wrote: > >BSD: http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license > >MIT/X11: http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html > > Unfortunately, that is a subtly different X11 license from the one at > opensource.org. :-( (X11 stuff is actually under a mix of very > similar but not quite identical licenses.) I prefer the one at > opensource.org, because it lacks the unnecessary "name of a copyright > holder shall not be used... to promote..." clause. Wait a second... AFAICT, there are two main licenses that are ambiguously also known as "MIT license": the Expat license (http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt) and the X11 license (http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html). AFAIK, the latter is the only one known as "X11 license", even though, as you correctly point out, various free X11 implementations (XFree86 before version 4.3.99cannotremember, Xorg, ...) are under a mix of different (but similar) licenses, and not only under the "X11 license"... -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpXvk4j7NQLA.pgp
Description: PGP signature