On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:27:08PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > wording of the definition is unfortunate, and needs work, but the real > question is, would any sane person or court really consider a work > that cites another work to be a modified version of the original work? If the work that cites another work is based on that other work, the answer is yes. If there is no creative content shared between the works in question, then the answer is no. -- Raul