Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
From: Humberto Massa <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:47:52 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 425E8298.5060208@almg.gov.br>
In-reply-to: <gTiXh.A.ec.G4nXCB@murphy>
References: <gTiXh.A.ec.G4nXCB@murphy>

Måns Rullgård wrote:


It would be, if the license said it was.  As it happens, the license
makes no mention of this, but does give explicit permission to make
any modifications desired.

If EXPORT_XX are copyright notices, copyright *law* prohibit theirmodification.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
  - From: Måns Rullgård <mru@inprovide.com>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
  - From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>

Prev by Date: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Next by Date: (DRAFT 2) FAQ on documentation licensing
Previous by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Next by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread