Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> One of the options is to even ship the firmware in the kernel tarbal but
> from a separate directory with a clear license clarification text in it.
I think that's what we should do. I currently don't have any firmware
requiring devices, but I'd volunteer to keep such a tarball for now if
no one else wants to do tiny amount of work.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>