<quote who="MJ Ray" date="2005-03-31 20:01:27 +0000"> > "Benj. Mako Hill" <mako@debian.org> wrote: > > <quote who=3D"MJ Ray" date=3D"2005-03-30 22:15:15 +0000"> > > > [...] I'm not sure > > > about the situation when they just link to the ambiguous page > > > which has had clarifications issued in obscure places by CC (along > > > with statements relying on the US view of "fair use" IIRC). > > Great. The latter case is by far the most common. If you go to the CC > > website, it instructs people to license their works through > > linking. That's why they don't provide a copy suitable for inclusion > > with a work. > > Do they even recommend licensing non-software works through > linking, JOOI? Apparently, yes. > > > I reject your attempt to make me decide without extra data. > > What extra data do you need? > > So far we've had apparently-expert opinions in both directions > about how this situation would be viewed by courts. I feel I > need some reason to value a particular expert above others. It > may be that I've missed some relevant post in the volume. > > Then again, that's unnecessary work if CC follow WCAG better. We can ask SPI's lawyer for an opinion if you think that would help. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako@debian.org http://mako.yukidoke.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature