On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:36:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > Removal of the pacman image is the > only one that I can see any case for at all Even if this were once true (which I doubt), there's no chance that anybody still has a valid trademark on pacman; it's diluted to the point of being common usage. Random example: http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2002-03-04&res=l This sort of stuff is common. Now, if you were making a *game* and used it as a character, *then* you might have a problem. Oh, and while we're on the subject of trademarks: http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2001-07-11&res=l -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature