Matthias Klose wrote: > Josh Triplett writes: >>Matthias Klose wrote: >> >>>CC'ing debian-legal, please could you have a look at the license? >> >>The question being "is this acceptable to go into non-free"? > > exactly. OK. > I asked to clarify the paragraph, the current text now has append "and > the terms of the LGPL". > > "The Proprietary Source Software, which is delivered in object code > format only, such as the ".o files", shall in no event be > disassembled, reverse engineered, decompiled or otherwise "be opened" > and the results realised insofar shall not be copied or distributed > without the prior written approval of AVM except to the extent as may > be expressly authorized under mandatory law and the terms of the LGPL." With this addition, the software can be distributed in non-free. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature