Re: Strange restrictions

[Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>]

Dave Harding wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> >
> > > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use
> > > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking
> > > system and implement some form of version management" (I might
> > > still, on a question of practicality, or even a basic question of
> > > "Does this make it a required cost of the software, and is that
> > > OK?", but it would be a matter of another debate entirely, at that
> > > point).
> >
> > The problem with this sort of clause is usually the same: what the
> > hell does it mean?
>
> Or rather, what does it have to do with Mozilla's requirements?

Indeed - I proposed no requirement of that form. There's no good way of 
predicting whether someone will ship good or bad software except track 
record.

Gerv