Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions
A member of the IPR WG proposed to require that people modifying RFCs
would be required to add a "warning label". He suggested the
following license. Would this be DFSG free? I believe it would be.
It appears to be an extreme form of statements such as "clearly label
modified works as being modified", which I believe is permitted.
FYI, I have updated my proposed license text, see:
<http://josefsson.org/bcp78broken/>
Thanks,
Simon
c. The Contributor grants third parties the irrevocable
right to copy, use and distribute the Contribution, with
or without modification, in any medium, without royalty,
provided that unauthorized redistributed modified works
do not contain misleading author, version, name of work,
or endorsement information, and that the following text
is included in any subsequent distribution:
"Warning: This text describes a derrivative of the
standard defined in RFCXXXX; the reader should be warned
that this modified work may not operate in a way that is
compatible with the protocol defined in RFCXXXX, and that
using this modified work could result in incompatability
with RFCXXXX, and thus fail to interoperate properly with
compliant implementations of RFCXXX. Therefore, the reader
is strongly urged to carefully review this documentation
and the code it accompanies, to determine where this
implemention is potentially incompatible with RFCXXX, and
determine if such differences with RFCXXXX (if they exist)
are acceptable."
In addition, any unauthorized redistributed modified
works must not claim endorsement of the modified work by
the IETF, IESG, IANA, IAB, ISOC, RFC Editor, or any
similar organization, and remove any claims of status as
an Internet Standard, e.g., by removing the RFC
boilerplate. The IETF requests that any citation or
excerpt of unmodified text reference the RFC or other
document from which the text is derived.
Reply to: