Re: SELinux patent time bomb?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SELinux patent time bomb?
From: Mahesh Pai <paivakil@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:03:59 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 77830edc0510110533l67dc2790v9cfe871742ca04b7@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 77830edc0510110516qeda7a61n9082f67870c9f7af@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20051010210830.GA5256@tofu.mamane.lu> <[🔎] 77830edc0510110302k5804638m1d43bbb56623e4d9@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20051011101219.GB4836@tennyson.dodds.net> <[🔎] 77830edc0510110516qeda7a61n9082f67870c9f7af@mail.gmail.com>

Anyway, does
http://www.securecomputing.com/pdf/Statement_of_Assurance.pdf
solve the concerns?

On 10/11/05, Mahesh Pai <paivakil@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/05, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > That's not what /usr/share/doc/libselinux/copyright says on my system.

Reply to:

References:
- SELinux patent time bomb?
  - From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
- Re: SELinux patent time bomb?
  - From: Mahesh Pai <paivakil@gmail.com>
- Re: SELinux patent time bomb?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: SELinux patent time bomb?
  - From: Mahesh Pai <paivakil@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)
Next by Date: Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)
Previous by thread: Re: SELinux patent time bomb?
Next by thread: MySQL only useable for GPL clients?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread